Crime and punishment raise deep religious and ethical questions about justice, mercy, human dignity and the purpose of punishment. All major world religions address these questions — though they reach different conclusions about whether punishment should deter, reform or simply satisfy justice. GCSE RE requires you to know these differences and apply them.

What are the purposes of punishment?

Before looking at what religions teach, it helps to understand the main purposes that philosophers and legal theorists identify for punishment.

Purpose Explanation Example
Retribution Punishment gives offenders what they deserve; restores justice by balancing wrongdoing with penalty "An eye for an eye"
Deterrence Punishment discourages the offender (individual deterrence) and others (general deterrence) from committing crimes Long prison sentences to frighten potential criminals
Rehabilitation Punishment should reform the offender so they do not reoffend Education programmes, therapy in prison
Protection Punishment removes dangerous offenders from society Imprisonment, execution
Reparation The offender makes amends to the victim or community Community service, compensation payments

Different religions emphasise different purposes, and often combine several.

What does Christianity teach about crime and punishment?

Christianity approaches crime through several central values: human dignity (every person is made in the image of God), forgiveness, redemption and justice.

Retribution: many Christians accept that wrongdoing deserves punishment — based on principles of justice and the idea that God is a just judge. Romans 13 teaches that rulers are God's servants in punishing wrongdoers.

Rehabilitation and forgiveness: Christianity strongly emphasises the possibility of reform. Jesus's interactions with criminals and outcasts — including his words to the criminal crucified beside him ("Today you will be with me in paradise", Luke 23:43) — suggest that no person is beyond redemption. Prison chaplaincy, restorative justice programmes and support for prisoner rehabilitation are all expressions of Christian values in practice.

The death penalty: Christians are divided. Some, drawing on the Old Testament (Genesis 9:6 — "Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed") accept capital punishment for the most serious crimes. Others, drawing on the New Testament's emphasis on forgiveness and human dignity, oppose it entirely. The Catholic Church's Catechism (updated in 2018) now states that capital punishment is "inadmissible" because it violates human dignity.

What does Islam teach about crime and punishment?

Islamic teaching on crime and punishment is based on the Qur'an, the Hadith (the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad) and Sharia (Islamic law as interpreted by scholars).

Islamic law distinguishes between two main categories of crimes:

  • Hudud crimes (crimes against God): these include theft, robbery, adultery, and apostasy (leaving Islam). Fixed punishments are specified in the Qur'an for hudud offences, including amputation for theft and flogging for certain offences. These punishments are extremely rarely applied in practice and carry strict conditions of evidence — scholars debate whether the conditions can ever be met.
  • Tazir crimes: offences not covered by hudud, where judges have discretion in sentencing. The majority of criminal cases fall here.

Islam strongly emphasises justice, mercy and the rights of victims and society. The principle of qisas (retaliation) allows victims or their families to demand equivalent punishment — but the Qur'an equally encourages forgiveness and accepting compensation (diya) instead. Forgiveness is described as better: "If anyone forgives and makes reconciliation, his reward is due from Allah" (Qur'an 42:40).

Islam's emphasis on rehabilitation is also significant: the Qur'an repeatedly emphasises repentance (tawbah) and God's mercy toward those who genuinely turn from wrongdoing.

What do other religions teach?

Judaism: Jewish law (Halakhah), derived from the Torah and the Talmud, places high value on justice (tzedek). The Torah specifies penalties for offences, but Talmudic interpretation set such high standards of evidence for capital punishment that some rabbis suggest it was rarely if ever applied. Restorative justice — repairing harm done to the victim and community — is central to the Jewish approach.

Buddhism: Buddhism does not have a legal code, but Buddhist ethics emphasise that all actions have consequences (karma), that suffering is caused by ignorance and craving rather than innate evil, and that rehabilitation and compassion are more effective responses to crime than harsh punishment. Buddhism tends to oppose capital punishment because it involves killing, which violates ahimsa (non-violence), and because it removes the possibility of spiritual development and repentance.

Hinduism: Hindu teaching emphasises dharma (right conduct and duty) and the law of karma (actions carry consequences in this life and future lives). Punishment is seen as serving justice and restoring the social order. The Manusmriti (Laws of Manu), a traditional text, prescribes punishments for offences, though Hindu practice varies widely across communities and time.

Sikhism: Sikh teaching values justice (nyao) and mercy. The Guru Granth Sahib does not specify criminal punishments but emphasises that people should be treated with dignity. Sikhism generally favours rehabilitation over harsh retributive punishment, and strongly opposes capital punishment.

What is restorative justice and do religions support it?

Restorative justice is an approach to crime that focuses on repairing harm — bringing together victims, offenders and communities to agree on how the offender can make amends, rather than simply punishing them. It has strong support from many religious traditions:

  • Christianity: restorative justice reflects values of forgiveness, reconciliation and restoration of community
  • Islam: the qisas system's allowance for the victim to accept compensation instead of punishment is a form of restorative justice
  • Judaism: the concept of teshuvah (repentance, making amends) is central to Jewish responses to wrongdoing
  • Buddhism: emphasis on repairing harm and reducing suffering aligns with restorative approaches

Frequently asked questions

Do all Christians oppose capital punishment?

No. There is genuine disagreement within Christianity. Some evangelical Protestants, particularly in the United States, support capital punishment, citing Genesis 9:6 and Romans 13. The Catholic Church, most Protestant denominations in Europe, and the Church of England broadly oppose it, emphasising human dignity and the possibility of rehabilitation. The key tension is between Old Testament legal codes that specify capital punishment and New Testament teachings that stress forgiveness, mercy and the sanctity of human life.

What does GCSE RE mean by "justice"?

In GCSE RE, justice generally refers to being treated fairly and receiving what you deserve — either as punishment for wrongdoing or protection for rights. Religions distinguish between different aspects of justice: retributive justice (punishment proportionate to wrongdoing), restorative justice (repairing harm), and social justice (addressing inequality and structural causes of crime). Most exam questions ask you to show how a religion balances justice with mercy, or compare how two religions approach a specific aspect of punishment.

How should I structure a GCSE RE answer on crime and punishment?

For a 12-mark evaluation question, you should: state a religious view and support it with specific teaching (e.g. "Christians believe in rehabilitation because Jesus forgave criminals — Luke 23:43"); give a second Christian view or contrast it with another religion; consider a non-religious (humanist or secular) perspective; and reach a justified conclusion that weighs up the different positions. Always use the specific religious vocabulary: teshuvah, dharma, karma, qisas, hudud, ahimsa, tazir.

Is the death penalty supported by any UK religion?

No mainstream UK religious denomination currently supports capital punishment. The UK abolished the death penalty for murder in 1965. The Church of England, the Catholic Church in England and Wales, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Muslim Council of Britain, Buddhist and Sikh representative bodies all either oppose capital punishment explicitly or emphasise rehabilitation and human dignity in ways inconsistent with it. This makes the UK RE curriculum context different from, say, the United States, where significant Christian communities support capital punishment.


Want Professor Harari to help you build a complete 12-mark RE evaluation answer on crime and punishment, with specific religious teachings? Add the AI Tutors connector at aitutors.me.