Anaphora is the rhetorical device of repeating the same word or phrase at the beginning of consecutive clauses or lines. It gives writing a powerful sense of rhythm and momentum. Speakers from Martin Luther King to Winston Churchill have used it to make audiences feel the accumulation of an argument building towards a single point.

What exactly is anaphora?

The word comes from the Greek anaphora, meaning "carrying back" — the repeated phrase at the start of each clause carries the reader or listener back to the same point before propelling them forward. The defining feature is the position: the repetition must come at the beginning of successive clauses, lines, or sentences.

Compare this to epistrophe (repetition at the end of clauses) and symploce (repetition at both ends). At KS3, you need to know anaphora; the others are useful for extending your analysis if you encounter them.

Anaphora works because repetition creates rhythm, and rhythm creates anticipation. Each repeated phrase builds on the last, and the reader begins to expect — and lean into — what comes next.

What are some well-known examples of anaphora?

Here are examples drawn from political speeches, poetry, and fiction — the three main contexts where you will encounter anaphora in KS3 English:

Source Example Repeated phrase
Martin Luther King Jr., I Have a Dream (1963) "I have a dream that one day… I have a dream that one day…" "I have a dream"
Winston Churchill (1940) "We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields…" "We shall fight"
Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness…" "It was the"
Wilfred Owen, Dulce et Decorum Est "Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! — An ecstasy of fumbling…" Note: short repeated cry — not full anaphora but related urgency device
William Blake, London "In every cry of every Man, / In every Infant's cry of fear, / In every voice, in every ban" "In every"

Notice that anaphora is not the same as simple repetition scattered through a text. The critical element is the structural, line-opening placement.

How does anaphora create effect?

Anaphora does several things simultaneously:

  • Creates rhythm and momentum. The repeated phrase acts like a drumbeat, setting pace and making the writing feel inevitable.
  • Emphasises accumulation. Each new clause adds to a growing list of ideas, evidence, or images, making the argument feel overwhelming in its force.
  • Unifies the passage. The repeated phrase acts as a thread connecting all the clauses into a single, coherent movement of thought.
  • Makes phrases memorable. Because the ear expects the pattern, the variations — what changes after the repeated opener — land with greater impact.

When you analyse anaphora, the key question is: what is being accumulated? In Churchill's speech, it is different battlegrounds — the effect is to suggest that surrender is simply not an option, no matter the terrain. In Blake, repeating "in every" creates a sense of inescapable suffering woven into the fabric of the city.

How is anaphora different from ordinary repetition?

Not all repetition is anaphora. Here is a quick way to tell them apart:

Anaphora: The same word or phrase opens each clause or line — the repetition is structural and positional.
"We will not stop. We will not yield. We will not rest."

General repetition: A word or phrase recurs anywhere in the text, without the structural position being the key feature.
"Stop. Do not stop doing what you love. Never stop."

In the second example, "stop" recurs, but the position varies. It creates emphasis but not the building, forward-driving rhythm of true anaphora.

How do I write about anaphora in an analysis?

Apply the point–evidence–explain framework and focus on what the repetition is building towards:

Worked example — analysing Churchill's "We shall fight" speech

  1. Point: Churchill uses anaphora to convey absolute determination and make retreat seem inconceivable.
  2. Evidence: "We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets."
  3. Explain: The repeated phrase "we shall fight" begins each new clause with the same certainty, creating a drumbeat rhythm that mirrors the unbreakable will Churchill is trying to project. The listener is carried from one battlefield to the next, each new location adding to a sense that resistance will continue no matter what. The anaphora transforms a list of places into a declaration of national character.

Observe that the analysis goes beyond naming the device — it interprets the cumulative logic of the pattern.

Where will I see anaphora in my KS3 work?

Anaphora appears most frequently in:

  • Persuasive and rhetorical non-fiction — speeches, opinion pieces, political writing
  • Poetry — particularly protest poetry, elegies, and verse with a public, declamatory tone
  • Prose fiction — when a character's internal thought becomes heightened and rhythmically charged
  • Your own writing — three parallel anaphoric clauses can give a speech or argument a polished, oratorical feel

Frequently asked questions

Is anaphora always found in political speeches?

No, though political oratory is one of its most famous homes. Anaphora appears in poetry (Blake, Whitman, Owen), in prose (Dickens is full of it), in religious texts, in advertising slogans, and in song lyrics. Wherever a writer wants to create the feeling of accumulation and inevitability, anaphora is a natural tool.

What is the difference between anaphora and a list?

A list simply names items in sequence. Anaphora uses a repeated phrase to give the list a rhythm and a sense of crescendo. "We need food, shelter, and rest" is a list. "We need food. We need shelter. We need rest." is anaphoric and carries far more urgency because each new need arrives with the same insistence.

Does anaphora always use the exact same words?

The repeated element should be recognisably the same phrase, but minor grammatical variations (such as "I have a dream" versus "I have a dream that") still count as anaphora if the structure and opening phrase are shared. What matters is that the reader or listener perceives the pattern.

How do I avoid just saying "the writer uses repetition for effect" in my analysis?

Identify specifically what is being repeated (a phrase, a clause opener), name it as anaphora, and then explain what is being accumulated — what grows in scale, certainty, or emotional weight with each repetition. That precision is what separates a mark-worthy analysis from a vague observation.

Professor Quill is ready to show you how anaphora works in any text you bring to aitutors.me — practise spotting it before you write about it.